<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Cybos: playbooks and cases</title>
  <subtitle>Open playbooks, cases and infrastructure guides for CEOs building AI-native mid-market and enterprise companies.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://cybos.ai/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://cybos.ai/"/>
  <id>https://cybos.ai/</id>
  <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Cybos</name><email>hello@cybos.ai</email></author>
  <entry>
    <title>Westpac: 12,500 banker hours saved in the first month of operation, July 2026</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/westpac-l3-01/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/westpac-l3-01/</id>
    <published>2026-08-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Westpac: 12,500 banker hours saved in the first month of operation, July 2026, annualised at 150,000 hours (AFR, 5 August 2026).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Foundation Risk Partners: $10M EBITDA uplift from two agent systems, Partners Group says</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/foundation-risk-partners-p2-02/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/foundation-risk-partners-p2-02/</id>
    <published>2026-08-03T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Foundation Risk Partners: New-client policy processing cycle cut 94%; close rates doubled; 120 bps EBITDA margin uplift worth USD 10M; first use case went from concept to production in 14 weeks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>C.H. Robinson: 2–3 minutes per ocean or air freight quote, down from one to three days</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/c-h-robinson-p2-01/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/c-h-robinson-p2-01/</id>
    <published>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>C.H. Robinson: NAST adjusted operating margin 40.3% and Global Forwarding adjusted operating margin 36.6% in Q3 2026; annual token cost under $2M on a run-rate basis. Ocean and air price quotes that took a day (air) or two to three days (ocean) now take two to three minutes; missed-pickup agents aut</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>L3Harris: 10 minutes to scope a supply shortage, down from 3 months and 30 people</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/l3harris-l2-02/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/l3harris-l2-02/</id>
    <published>2026-09-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>L3Harris: Scoping which programs a glass shortage for circuit boards affects now takes ~10 minutes, versus ~3 months and ~30 people before; a fine-tuned open model on the same data beat a frontier model on country-of-origin monitoring at 95% lower model cost.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Shopify: 96% lower estimated serving cost for one agent</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/shopify-l4-01/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/shopify-l4-01/</id>
    <published>2026-08-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Shopify: Estimated serving cost fell from ~$27M/year on a frontier model to ~$1M/year (-96%); quality surpassed the frontier baseline on Shopify's judge; end-to-end latency -38% and time-to-first-token -19% at 350 req/min; ~14% fewer GPUs for the same traffic.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bridgewater Associates: 13.8x lower cost per task, with higher accuracy than the best frontier model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/bridgewater-associates-l4-04/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/bridgewater-associates-l4-04/</id>
    <published>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Bridgewater Associates: Accuracy 84.7% vs 78.2% for the best frontier model (29.8% fewer mistakes) at 13.8x lower inference cost per task; frontier models averaged ~50% with simple prompts and stayed under 80% with expert prompts.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Zurich Commercial Insurance: 80% less manual submission triage time</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/zurich-commercial-insurance-l3-10/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/zurich-commercial-insurance-l3-10/</id>
    <published>2026-09-22T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Zurich Commercial Insurance: 80% reduction in manual submission triage time; digitisation accuracy from below 80% to 98%; live across more than 20 markets.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AT&amp;T: Up to 90% lower AI cost, AT&amp;T says</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/at-t-l1-01/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/at-t-l1-01/</id>
    <published>2026-07-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>AT&amp;T: AI costs reduced 'as much as 90%', 'already saving millions'; 45 billion tokens/day on average.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pinterest: &lt;8% of closed-model cost per transaction</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/pinterest-l1-02/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/pinterest-l1-02/</id>
    <published>2026-08-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Pinterest: Cost per transaction with open models at less than 8% of comparable closed proprietary models, with 'superior performance for our use cases' (e.g., Pinterest Assistant).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uber: 52% lower cost per agent session since the June peak</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l1-04/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l1-04/</id>
    <published>2026-08-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Uber: Cost per session down 52% from its June 2026 peak, with the model held constant. Uber's uReview benchmark showed switching models improved F1 while sharply cutting cost per review.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Databricks: 30%+ lower average task cost from smart routing, internal coding work</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/databricks-l1-06/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/databricks-l1-06/</id>
    <published>2026-10-22T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Databricks: Unit costs down 'as much as 90%' in some cases; model switching alone 50%+; spend reports ~10%; Smart Router cut average task cost by more than 30% at roughly top-model quality (65% of Opus 5 cost per task on internal coding workloads); output close to doubled with the same team.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meta: 85% of cases resolved by versioned rules, LLM only for the rest</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/meta-l1-07/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/meta-l1-07/</id>
    <published>2026-06-25T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Meta: ~85% of traffic resolved deterministically in single-digit milliseconds (~40 ms with context assembly); LLM path handles ~15% at roughly 400x the compute cost and seconds of latency.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DoorDash: 53.6% recall for a two-model reviewer vs 30.7% single-pass</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/doordash-l1-08/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/doordash-l1-08/</id>
    <published>2026-07-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>DoorDash: Production reviewer (Sonnet 4.6 scout + Opus 4.8 reviewer): 53.6% weighted recall vs 30.7% for a single-pass GPT-5.5 baseline, at $3.91/PR. Swapping the scout to open-weight Kimi K2.6: $2.35/PR at 45.8% recall.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Replit: 65% lower cost at the same quality, Replit's testing</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/replit-l1-09/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/replit-l1-09/</id>
    <published>2026-08-26T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Replit: Same output quality at 65% lower cost than the previous version of Max Mode, in Replit's testing.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ramp: 30% lower LLM cost on its own products</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/ramp-l1-11/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/ramp-l1-11/</id>
    <published>2026-08-19T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Ramp: Cut Ramp's own LLM costs 30% while improving speed and intelligence, CTO Rahul Sengottuvelu said in July 2026.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Grab: 500+ services behind one LLM gateway</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/grab-l1-12/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/grab-l1-12/</id>
    <published>2026-07-24T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Grab: 500+ services and 50+ MCP servers on the framework; billions of tokens per month through one gateway (no cost figure published).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Targa Telematics: 3.4B+ tokens processed on-prem in seven weeks</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/targa-telematics-l1-13/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/targa-telematics-l1-13/</id>
    <published>2026-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Targa Telematics: First seven weeks: ~30,000 developer requests, 3.4B+ tokens processed, 65M tokens generated, ~150 engineers using it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Atos: 1% → 99% valid structured output after fine-tuning a small model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/atos-for-a-german-public-sector-customer-l1-14/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/atos-for-a-german-public-sector-customer-l1-14/</id>
    <published>2026-10-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Atos: Fine-tuned Phi-4 Mini JSON validity rose from 1% to ~99% (GPT-4.1: 96%); on a 34-point rubric the best fine-tuned model (Qwen 2.5 7B, 30.8) edged GPT-4.1 with a detailed prompt (30.5); training needed at most 3 GPUs.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Descript: 1–2 hours to evaluate a new model, down from a week or more</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/descript-l1-16/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/descript-l1-16/</id>
    <published>2026-09-15T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Descript: 1 to 13 models in production (Aug 2026); time to evaluate a new model cut from a week or more to 1-2 hours.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ito: 55% lower median cost per pipeline run after moving to an open model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/ito-l1-17/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/ito-l1-17/</id>
    <published>2026-07-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Ito: Median cost per pipeline run -55%; weekly spend -28% while volume +8%. Trade-offs: median step 23 to 29 min; failed terminal states 2.4% to 4.5%; open model used 2.18x output tokens.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uniper: 27 days faster time-to-sign for candidates</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/uniper-l2-01/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/uniper-l2-01/</id>
    <published>2026-09-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Uniper: Average time-to-sign for candidates cut by 27 days; screening phase shortened by 13 days. Before production, the same prompts run on raw HR-system data returned generic answers, while the process-grounded agent named Uniper-specific bottlenecks.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CVS Health: 2 months for a 1% forecast-error gain that last took a year</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/cvs-health-l2-04/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/cvs-health-l2-04/</id>
    <published>2026-08-26T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>CVS Health: Weighted MAPE (forecast error) improved 1% in the 2 months after deployment, versus about a year for the previous 1% gain; the speaker values that at roughly $5–10M a year in reduced overtime and overstaffing. Data scientists had been spending ~20 hours a week acting as analysts.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Kirkland &amp; Ellis: Days → minutes for fund-formation analysis and drafting, the firm says</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/kirkland-ellis-l2-06/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/kirkland-ellis-l2-06/</id>
    <published>2026-08-03T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Kirkland &amp; Ellis: Analysis, discussion and drafting work that took a lawyer days now takes minutes (firm statement quoted on Palantir's earnings call).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NVIDIA: 86.7% accuracy from a model trained on planners' decision records</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/nvidia-l2-07/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/nvidia-l2-07/</id>
    <published>2026-09-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>NVIDIA: On a development set, the model trained on planner decision records reached 86.7% accuracy on allocation decisions, versus 55.5% for a large general model and 17.5% for the untrained base model.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Elmet Group: 10 apps on a legacy ERP in two months</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/the-elmet-group-l2-08/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/the-elmet-group-l2-08/</id>
    <published>2026-09-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>The Elmet Group: CRM data integration that normally takes months was completed by Palantir's team in about two days (the executive thought perhaps two hours), the company says; ten operational apps delivered in two months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uber: Thousands of internal tools exposed to agents with zero service changes</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l2-10/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l2-10/</id>
    <published>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Uber: Hundreds of MCP servers and thousands of tools catalogued, exposed with zero changes to downstream services.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Experian: 25% higher win rates in one division, vendor-reported</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/experian-l2-13/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/experian-l2-13/</id>
    <published>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Experian: 25% lift in win rates.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cisco: 26% higher win rates in early-adopting teams, Gong reports</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/cisco-l2-14/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/cisco-l2-14/</id>
    <published>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Cisco: Early-adopting teams show roughly 32% larger deal sizes and 26% higher win rates, Gong reports.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unilever: Days → minutes for finance analysis, the company says</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/unilever-l2-15/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/unilever-l2-15/</id>
    <published>2026-07-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Unilever: Finance analysis that took days now takes minutes; 1,200+ users targeted; multi-million-euro annual cost avoidance expected from customer analysis and credit-risk monitoring.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ondas: ~3 months for post-acquisition integration, the company says</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/ondas-l2-16/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/ondas-l2-16/</id>
    <published>2026-09-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Ondas: Post-acquisition integration cycles compressed from a typical 12–24 months to about 3 months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Atlassian customers: 20% more Jira work items completed by adopters</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/atlassian-customers-l2-17/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/atlassian-customers-l2-17/</id>
    <published>2026-08-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Atlassian customers: Rovo adopters complete 20% more Jira work items and create/edit 25% more Confluence pages than non-adopters.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stripe: 26% shorter median compliance review time</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/stripe-l3-02/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/stripe-l3-02/</id>
    <published>2026-06-26T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Stripe: 26% reduction in median review handling time, with over 96% helpfulness rating from reviewers.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coinbase: 75% of pull requests created by agents</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/coinbase-l3-04/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/coinbase-l3-04/</id>
    <published>2026-08-31T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Coinbase: 75% of all pull requests created by agents (Cursor customer story); some teams cut idea-to-production from 20 days to under 2; security reviews from three days to five minutes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DoorDash: 2,000 sessions auto-graded a day before launch</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/doordash-l3-06/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/doordash-l3-06/</id>
    <published>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>DoorDash: Quality signal grew from ~1 employee feedback report to 2,000 auto-graded sessions a day; agent quality score up 8 points and error rate nearly halved before nationwide launch; a manual regression test that took more than six hours now runs in ~20 minutes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uber: 70%+ of pull requests attributed to agents</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l3-07/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/uber-l3-07/</id>
    <published>2026-08-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Uber: More than 70% of pull requests attributed to agents; 30K+ agent skill executions a day; cost per session down 52% from its June 2026 peak.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Spotify: Months → days for codebase-wide migrations, run by one engineer</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/spotify-l3-08/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/spotify-l3-08/</id>
    <published>2026-06-03T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Spotify: Migrations that took hundreds of teams weeks or months now take one engineer a few days; the most recent Java migration across backend services took three days.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Siemens: 90% of inbound calls handled without a person</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/siemens-l3-11/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/siemens-l3-11/</id>
    <published>2026-07-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Siemens: 90% of inbound calls handled autonomously (resolved or correctly routed) without human intervention.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>LG Uplus: 70% → 96% agent accuracy through evaluation-driven development</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/lg-uplus-l3-12/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/lg-uplus-l3-12/</id>
    <published>2026-08-17T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>LG Uplus: Agent accuracy raised from 70% to 96% (+26 points).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Getmobil: 60% lower contact-centre cost</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/getmobil-l3-13/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/getmobil-l3-13/</id>
    <published>2026-06-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Getmobil: 100% of inbound contacts handled by AI agents first; 75% resolved end to end without escalation; contact-centre costs down 60%; response times 3x faster.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>TwinMed: 3,200 purchase orders a month supported by agents</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/twinmed-l3-14/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/twinmed-l3-14/</id>
    <published>2026-09-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>TwinMed: Agents support about 3,200 purchase orders a month across 260 suppliers.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerzbank: 20 h → 1 h manual document-review work</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/commerzbank-l3-15/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/commerzbank-l3-15/</id>
    <published>2026-10-08T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Commerzbank: Manual document-review work cut from 20 hours to 1 hour.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Shopify: ~7x faster responses from a post-trained open model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/shopify-l4-02/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/shopify-l4-02/</id>
    <published>2026-10-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Shopify: Judge score rose from 37.7 (base) to 74.5 after six loops and ~61,000 repaired examples, vs 73 for the frontier model; median full response 0.87 s vs 6.50 s (~7x faster); ~90% lower serving cost.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Travelers: Own LLM beat commercial models in internal tests, no figures published</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/travelers-l4-03/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/travelers-l4-03/</id>
    <published>2026-06-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Travelers: In testing on tens of thousands of insurance questions it outperformed commercial models on quality, cost and speed (no figures disclosed).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Harvey: 0.853 → 0.913 rubric pass rate after RL post-training</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/harvey-l4-05/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/harvey-l4-05/</id>
    <published>2026-06-22T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Harvey: Rubric pass rate 0.853 to 0.913, above Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh; all-pass rate 0.059 to 0.126; grading cost cut 40x by a smaller model with batched criteria.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Harvey: ~2x held-out LAB legal tasks completed vs base Kimi K3</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/harvey-l4-06/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/harvey-l4-06/</id>
    <published>2026-08-20T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Harvey: Harvey Tenet (Kimi K3 post-trained with Fireworks) completes almost twice as many held-out LAB tasks as base Kimi K3 (+9 pp all-pass rate). Separately post-trained Harvey models: a GLM-5.2 Review Table model (with Applied Compute) improves answer quality by 3.6 points and citation quality by</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fin: 16.5% fewer hallucinations than its previous own model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/intercom-fin-l4-07/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/intercom-fin-l4-07/</id>
    <published>2026-10-07T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Fin: Versus Apex 1.0: hard resolution +8.6%, resolution +1.7%, hallucinations -16.5%; live for every Fin customer.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Kasisto, deployed at 40+ financial institutions: 20-50x lower cost per query than GPT-4.1</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/backbase-l4-08/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/backbase-l4-08/</id>
    <published>2026-07-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Kasisto, deployed at 40+ financial institutions: Answer quality 6.21 vs 5.72 for GPT-4.1 on banking QA; ~$0.001 per query, 20-50x cheaper and 3-5x faster than GPT-4.1; training cost ~$1,800; deployed at 40+ financial institutions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Heidi Health: 25 s → 7 s scribe latency on a post-trained open model</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/heidi-health-l4-09/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/heidi-health-l4-09/</id>
    <published>2026-10-22T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Heidi Health: Scribe latency fell from 25 s to 7 s (3.5x), with POC to production in 4 weeks; post-trained Nemotron 3 Ultra wins ~54% of live clinician comparisons against the frontier model in production (base: ~42%).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Factory: 0.698 recall vs 0.588 for the best frontier model at a 5% false-alarm budget</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/factory-l4-10/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/factory-l4-10/</id>
    <published>2026-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Factory: At a strict 5% false-alarm budget, recall 0.698 vs 0.588 for GPT-5.5 and 0.574 for Opus 4.8 (non-overlapping 95% CIs), at lower cost and latency.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clay: Up to 47% lower inference cost at retained quality</title>
    <link href="https://cybos.ai/cases/clay-l4-11/"/>
    <id>https://cybos.ai/cases/clay-l4-11/</id>
    <published>2026-10-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <category term="case"/>
    <summary>Clay: Inference cost down up to 47% at retained quality; 48.2% savings at the 92.5% quality point vs always using the frontier model; can route hundreds of millions of queries a month in a fraction of a second per decision.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
